Rabbit Island Sunset, Hawaii |
I enjoy looking at vacation photos, especially now that
COVID is no longer a problem. I’m presently taking a much-needed vacation where
I’m spending time admiring the stunning Waimanalo sunsets on the island of
Oahu. While I don't post many pictures on social media when I travel to Hawaii, or on cruise vacations I do enjoy learning about the history of an area and
sharing it.
Many people believe that the wine industry is cyclical, and
while true particularly in grape growing, there are also distinct periods in the industry that
are characterized by unique events that don’t repeat themselves and shape the
industry. Those eras typically last from seven to 10-years.
THE LAST GENERATIONAL CHANGE
During the 1970s, there was a growing interest in premium wine. It was the start of consumer evolution from the WWII era consumers who preferred beer, jug wine, and cocktail parties, to boomers who were making their own alcohol discoveries with wine coolers, which pointed the generation toward premium wine.
THE LARGEST POSITIVE CHANGE WAS DUE TO PURE LUCK
Of greater concern in the 80s was the significant challenge posed by the anti-alcohol movement, which led to a decrease in demand. The trend reversed in the mid-90s due to a strong economy but more importantly, the emergence of the French Paradox and the Mediterranean Diet, and Arthur Klatsky's research on the J-shaped curve. These studies each suggested that moderate wine consumption had health benefits.
In 1994, the demand for premium wine saw a sharp rise, driven by the belief in the science supporting moderate consumption. The anti-alcohol movement took a temporary backseat, premiumization became a thing, and winemaking became the dominant industry issue. If you made good wine, it almost sold itself. This golden era lasted about seven years, during which time the number of wine producers mushroomed in the US.The end of the 90s boom came quickly with the Tech Recession
and 9/11. Distributors also concluded they couldn’t sell wine from all of the
new producers who had started during the period and began moving away from
smaller wineries. With supply and demand in balance in the early 2000s, the
main competitive issue shifted from "Can you make good wine?" to
"Can you sell your wine?"
THE BUSINESS GOT TOUGHER
That period lasted about seven years, while the
premium industry tried to process the depth of the shift in approach by the
distributors. Wineries started to develop new direct sales strategies. It was
an uncomfortable time, but we caught a real break when Free the Grapes helped
push a favorable ruling in Granholm v. Heald through the US Supreme Court,
allowing for the opportunity to ship wine direct to all states.
That phase ended after the 2008 recession, with the premium industry fully adopting the direct-to-consumer approach. The dominant issue had shifted again from “Can you sell wine” to “Can you sell wine direct.” The introductory phase of direct sales continued for about eight years when the industry started to deal with slowing sales growth.
The new dominant competitive issue has once again changed,
now to the quality of management. There are still many paths to success, but it
is dependent on the management team’s ability identify and to execute a plan. With
industry sales volumes now in decline, we are starting to see winners and losers.
Seven years into the most recent industry change, we find ourselves due for
another shift in the competitive issue.
WHAT COMES NEXT?
What will the factors be that create success in the next
decade? It might be an improved opportunity for even modest-sized wineries to
utilize data and find actionable strategies. Maybe we will see wineries crack
the code of selling directly into more states without asking the consumer to
come to your tasting room first. Or maybe the industry will decide to combine
forces with interested parties to advertise the category?
We mentioned several forces that have changed the industry
over the past 50 years that aren’t cyclical. But we are at a period of time that
is an echo of the 70s and 80s with the rotation of new consumers into their prime buying
years and the exit of the prior cohort. We are also once again dealing with messages - often times biased science, from the anti-alcohol coalition. It’s unlikely we’ll
luck out with the French Paradox part deux this time.
What's Your Opinion?
- What are your expectations for the next decade in the wine business?
- What events will shape the business?
- Do you see something coming that will spur consumer demand for wine, like the French Paradox?
Please share this post on your favorite social media platform.
Thank you for using your precious vacation time to think on this and share your thoughts, Rob. I read the (very useful) WineBusiness.com email news every weekday morning and haven't seen much "new" in quite awhile. I do feel like the industry is stuck in the doldrums right now, waiting for the wind to blow in some direction. I really have no idea which direction that will be. But things that used to work aren't gaining a whole lot of traction right now. Looking forward to seeing thoughts from others. And glad you made it through your own latest storm.
ReplyDeleteThanks Jon - the last storm for SVB was quite an uproar. I'm glad to have it in the rear view window.
DeleteI'm optimistic about the next 10 years but like many businesses, we will not only be competing against imports, but other alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, and each other.
My hope is the industry comes together to tackle some of the marketing issues that need to be addressed. We will be much better working together.
Agreed!
DeleteReally enjoyed reading this. The historical recount reminds us of the trends and also reminds us of our resilience. Agree wholeheartedly that we need to tackle the messaging as an industry team, we would all benefit. Everyday it changes and laws are so complex to understand which does not help.
ReplyDeleteRob—
ReplyDeleteFirst, it's good to see you getting a much-deserved break. Second, it is great to know from your previous posts that your research will continue. Your work is valuable.
Re: expectations, however, I'm not optimistic. I keep thinking of Aimé Guibert in the Mondovino video repeatedly saying, "Le vin est mort, le vin est mort"—i.e., wine is dead. Different context, of course (but it was a charming scene with his dog). Why my pessimism?
-- We have a resurgent anti-alcohol health trend among younger consumers, as well as medical professionals who are backtracking on the J-curve.
-- The boomer generation that bought wine for so long is disappearing, as are some iconic, charismatic winemakers and winery founders who generated enthusiasm and drove adoption.
-- Winery ownership is undergoing a great deal consolidation, not necessarily a good thing for a variety of reasons.
-- My under-40, and particularly under-30 friends to whom I offer wine are increasingly indifferent to it (or equally interested in beer and spirits).
-- Worse still, they value authenticity but we see a flood of mediocre wines on retail shelves, differentiated only by label art and artificial branding. No one keeps buying or trades up if their tasting experiences are unimpressive and there is no genuine story behind the wine.
Sorry to have commented at such length, but you asked an important question. I'm hoping my pessimism is proven wrong! I'll be looking to you for insight along the way as all work through what comes next.
Richard